Do Not Expect Too Much From the End of the World — Harm, Rebranded as Story
Movie Review

Do Not Expect Too Much From the End of the World, 2023
Radu Jude staples two lying centuries together, points a camera at one workday, and calls it Monday.
The alarm goes off in the dark, and by the time Angela’s workday ends it will be dark again. What happens in between is driving. Bucharest end to end and back, gate to gate, errand to errand, sixteen hours in a small car for a production company that has been hired to cast a workplace-safety video. Her job is to find maimed workers, people the job crushed or paralyzed or broke, and film them auditioning to play themselves. The multinational paying for it all will choose a winner the way clients choose anything: whichever injured man tells the truest-sounding story that blames nobody upstairs. Jude shoots her day in grainy black and white, and the choice never plays as an art-house pose. It plays like footage the century forgot to color. Through all of it drives Ilinca Manolache, running on caffeine and profanity, funnier than her circumstances and later than her next appointment, a woman moving through her life like a sentence nobody will let her finish. Do Not Expect Too Much From the End of the World is a comedy. It is also the most exact movie anyone has yet made about what work has turned into.
Then Jude does something strange and right. He splices in a second film, a real one: Angela Moves On, from 1981, about a woman driving a taxi through Ceausescu’s Bucharest, and he threads its color footage through his own until the two movies start talking. The old state film lied in one direction, work as socialist dignity, a nation of noble drivers. The safety video Angela is helping to make lies in the other, injury as personal carelessness, a nation of clumsy employees. Cut between the two Angelas long enough and the question of which picture tells the truth dissolves into the only question either century ever really asked, which is which picture pays. And then the rhyme grows a body. Dorina Lazar, the actress who drove that taxi four decades ago, turns up in the present playing the same woman, old now, because her son Ovidiu is the paralyzed worker whose story the company wants trimmed. What could have stayed a formal trick becomes a family. History here is not a backdrop. It is a mother who has been driving these same streets since the previous lie was in charge.
When the day gets too heavy to carry straight, Angela reaches for her phone, turns on a filter, and becomes Bobita: bald, dead-eyed, a manosphere goblin who talks like Andrew Tate’s echo and says the unsayable in a voice pitched somewhere between parody and poison. The persona is ugly, and the film does not apologize for her, because it understands what the alter ego is for. Bobita is not a vice. He is an anesthetic, the last little opening through which a person this tired can say anything at all. The internet in this movie forgives everything, records everything, and is exactly the size of her loneliness. Underneath the filter, Manolache is doing the real work, and it is worth watching closely: a woman who is abrasive because the job demands armor, funny because the job demands a reason to keep going, and hardest on herself because shame is the last thing she owns outright. Watch how still her face goes when people talk to her like a vending machine. Dignity is a finite resource in this economy, and she is not spending it on men holding clipboards.
The movie itself is a pile, and the pile is on purpose. Jude crams the frame with signage, dashcams, TikToks, Zoom calls. Uwe Boll wanders through a set, cheerful, relitigating the time he boxed his own critics. A marketing chief named Doris Goethe video-calls in from headquarters and confirms, when asked, that yes, the poet was her great-great-great-grandfather, and yes, it helps. Scenes run long enough for reality to contradict itself; cuts land hard enough to make you forget what the last shot just taught you, and to feel guilty about forgetting. The camera manages to be patient and panicked in the same breath, which sounds impossible and is actually just an honest report on modern time, where a person can be bored and drowning inside the same minute. The fair complaint is that somewhere past the second hour the repetition slides from enactment into endurance, and a few detours spend attention the ending has to earn back. That cost is real, and the film’s defense, that your own workday is also an unedited heap of tabs and errands, is true without making the sitting any easier. Jude knows the length is a tax. He charges it anyway, and the ending pays it back with interest.
Everything funnels down to the shoot itself: one fixed camera position, held for roughly half an hour, while the safety video gets made at the factory gate. Ovidiu sits in his wheelchair and says what happened. The sixteen-hour shift. The exhaustion. The barrier that was not where it should have been. Then, take by take, with pleases and thank-yous and a lawyer whose diction could split a hair lengthwise, the well-paid adults around him sand the story down. The shift goes first. Then the barrier. Then the company. What remains is a man agreeing, on camera, that he should have been more careful. Cue cards come out. Rain comes down. His mother objects and is politely managed. It plays as slapstick right up to the moment the jokes stop landing, and what you are watching by then is a small crowd of professionals cooperating to shorten a man’s story so the company’s liability can outlive him. Nobody sneers. Nobody twirls a mustache. Everyone is good at their job, and that is the horror. Once, plainly, the truth does get said out loud, and it lands with the dull thud of a thing nobody can circulate. It cannot be monetized, so it belongs only to the people standing in the rain. Jude does not build to an explosion. He builds to a shrug, and the shrug is the verdict: in this economy, justice is a scheduling conflict.
I left tired in a way I have learned to trust, the specific exhaustion of recognizing your own seat in the machine. Jude offers no fixes and flatters nobody, least of all himself; he has simply ground the mirror precise enough to be unflattering. If the film carries an ethic, it is Angela’s, held under all that profanity like a license: tell the truth even when it cannot help anyone, because the help is for you. The world is not going to apologize. That is no reason to stop being exact.
Lunara Film Debrief
- Score:★★★★½
- Year:2023
- Where to Watch:

Loach's carpenter is killed by paperwork the way Jude's Ovidiu is maimed by it twice, once by the job and once by the testimony. Loach grieves where Jude laughs, and the two tones turn out to be the same sentence handed down at different funerals.

Lumet's newsroom still believes a scream on live television can shake the tower. Jude's film is the half-century reply: the scream got a filter, a follower count, and a brand strategy. Watch them back to back and you can feel rage becoming content.
Jude's previous howl put a schoolteacher in front of a tribunal of hypocrites; this one promotes the tribunal to a multinational and swaps the verdict for a purchase order. Same method, colder target, longer reach.