
Everything Everywhere All at Once, 2022
Everything Everywhere All at Once — The Multiverse Is a Guilt Engine
Movie Review
Infinite universes, one debt: the Daniels build a cosmos whose only real purpose is to show a mother the bill for every life she did not live.
The disaster arrives before the first universe splits, and it is a kitchen table. Receipts everywhere. Evelyn Wang is doing the laundromat’s taxes while her soft-spoken husband tries to get a word in, her disapproving father is arriving from the airport of her worst memories, her daughter is at the door with a girlfriend Evelyn cannot bring herself to name out loud, and an IRS auditor with a letter opener for a personality is waiting to disallow her whole life, deduction by deduction. The camera treats this ordinary morning like a thriller, because for Evelyn it is one. Michelle Yeoh plays her as a woman whose attention has been broken into a thousand unfinished tasks, and you feel each one of them tugging. So when the science fiction premise finally detonates in an elevator, it does not feel like an escape from her condition. It feels like her condition given a cosmology. Every choice Evelyn did not make became a universe that did, and in nearly all of them she is more successful, more glamorous, more finished than the woman clutching the receipts. This multiverse is not a playground. It is a guilt engine, built to the exact specifications of an immigrant mother, and it renders every sacrifice she ever made visible as the shining life it bought for somebody else.
Here is the stroke of genius, and it is structural, not decorative: the access system runs on failure. To borrow a skill from another self, you have to do something improbable and humiliating. Eat the lip balm. Give yourself paper cuts. Declare love to your enemy. The branch universes grow from unlikely acts, so the fight choreography becomes a slapstick liturgy of self-abasement, and quietly it is the film’s whole moral case in motion. Evelyn can only save the day by doing the ridiculous things the dignified version of herself would never stoop to. Around her, the cast plays the same theology in different keys. Stephanie Hsu’s Joy flickers between sullen daughter and Jobu Tupaki, an omniversal nihilist in Elvis rhinestones who has seen everything at once and drawn the reasonable conclusion, which the film has the guts to state at full strength: if everything is possible, nothing matters. The everything bagel she has baked every fact of existence into is not really a doomsday weapon. It is an exit. And the answer, when it comes, does not come from Evelyn. It comes from Ke Huy Quan’s Waymond, in the performance of the decade’s most improbable comeback, a former child star two decades out of acting work playing a man whose gentleness the entire film mistakes for weakness. Then he explains himself, in a parking lot in one universe and a laundromat in another: kindness is how he fights. Not surrender. Strategy. The word for what Waymond does is not naive. It is unkillable.
And then the rocks. After an hour of genre-shredding velocity, hot-dog fingers, a raccoon chef, a wuxia alley, a universe where Evelyn walks a red carpet that looks suspiciously like the life Yeoh actually lived, the film cuts to a cliff in a universe where life never evolved. Two rocks. Wind. Silence. A mother and daughter talking in subtitles. No score, no motion, until a googly eye appears in the single funniest and most merciful cut of the year. The whole intelligence of the picture is compressed into that stillness: these two can only speak plainly once every distraction, including their own bodies, has been subtracted, and the quiet lands harder than any of the kinetics precisely because the kinetics built the pressure it releases.
The stretch around that scene is where the film falls short of itself. The back half keeps restaging its own crescendos, cycling Evelyn and Jobu through three or four confrontations more than the feeling requires, mistaking reprise for build, and at two hours and twenty minutes the sensory saturation starts spending attention it has not re-earned. I understand the defense: a film about overwhelm that manufactures overwhelm, the maximalism as the point. But a point can be proven and then belabored, and this one gets both.
It does not matter, finally, because the film knows exactly where it is going and lands there with both feet. Evelyn, handed the same omniscience that broke her daughter, chooses the opposite door. Not everything, everywhere. This thing, here. The failing laundromat, the soft husband, the difficult girl, the tax appointment rescheduled by a suddenly human auditor. The bagel is answered not with a counterargument but with a preference, chosen freely in full view of every alternative, which is the only kind of preference that means anything. Be kind, especially when nothing makes sense, the film says, and then it earns that sentiment the hard way, by staging the nothing at industrial scale first. Plenty of movies tell you one ordinary life is enough. This one builds every other life, prices them, tours them, and comes home anyway. That is not sentimentality. That is arithmetic, done honestly, in front of you, with googly eyes.
Lunara Film Debrief
- Score:★★★★★
- Oscar Ledger11 nominations • 7 wins
- Year:2022
- Where to Watch:

Theme Echo
What is this film really about — and who else has said it?
The Matrix (1999)
The chosen-one template this film lovingly takes apart: same wire-fu, same tear in reality, except Neo is the one who matters and Evelyn is the one who does not, in every universe, which is exactly why she can save all of them. The Daniels turn the power fantasy inside out and find a mother sewn into the lining.

Counter Program
What is the strongest argument against it?
Paterson (2016)
The anti-multiverse: one week, one bus driver, one small life watched so patiently it becomes sufficient. Jarmusch reaches by subtraction the same conclusion the Daniels reach by explosion, and watching them back to back is the whole debate over how much cinema one true sentence requires.

Career Context
Where does this sit in the artist's story?
Swiss Army Man (2016)
The Daniels' first feature ran the same play at smaller scale: begin with the most juvenile object imaginable, a flatulent corpse there, a butt plug and a bagel here, and walk it with a straight face all the way to sincerity. The method was never randomness. It was disarmament.